?
Hi All:
For anyone who is dealing with Dr. Guy, I would recommend reviewing the attached decision by EDNY Judge Matsumoto, which is referenced in the deposition transcript Allie circulated. In Robinson (a federal civil rights case alleging false arrest, excessive force, etc.), Defendants filed a motion to preclude Dr. Guy from testifying as an expert, and the Court granted the motion (in part), citing, among other reasons, the fact that (1) Dr. Guy indicated in his expert report that his expert opinion relied on medical records that postdated his expert report, (2) that he opined on Plaintiffs need for future psychiatric care for anxiety/depression, despite not being qualified as a physiatrist/physical medicine doctor to render such opinion, (3) evaluated Plaintiff over two years after the alleged incident, and (4) offered no support for his conclusion that the incident actually caused the alleged injuries. The judge merely allowed Dr. Guy to testify at trial as to his observations of Plaintiff during his examination, but could not testify as to any opinions regarding those injuries (thus, essentially as merely a treating physician).
Chuck Faillace
Partner
Barker Patterson Nichols, LLP
Cell: 929-417-7404
E-mail: c.faillace@bpn.law