Start with In re Wood (waiver) and go from there . . .
52 N.Y.2d 139, 418 N.E.2d 365, 436 N.Y.S.2d 850
In the Matter of the Estate of Robert S. Wood, Deceased. Nathan M. Medwin, as Executor of Robert S. Wood, Deceased, Appellant; Frank H. Purzycki et al., Respondents.
Robert R. Sappe, Esq.
Feldman, Kleidman, Collins & Sappe, LLP
995 Main St., P.O. Box A
Fishkill, NY 12524
(845)897-5199
www.FKCS.law
[cid:image001.png@01DB2F6E.03100090]
[cid:image002.png@01DB2F6E.03100090]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ** 2510-2521, and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium please advise the sender immediately.
From: list
Sent: Monday, November 4, 2024 7:18 PM
To: list
Subject: Deadman’s Statute [WARNING: External Sender]
*** Member’s Message ****
Sender: Peter Taglia
Date: 11/4/2024 7:15:33 PM
The plaintiff’s attorney, Brian Shochet, is seeking to preclude various defendants from testifying as to conversations with the decedent in a failure to dx cancer (multiple myleoma) case. As pertains to my client and a codefendant, he wants to prevent them from testifying as to DC instructions advising f/u with previously treating docs while claiming that they were inadequate and having children, one. of whom was present at DC, give a contrived version of them (that their mother was told only to f/u in the sense of keeping “whatever” appointments she had with them). It seems to me that once he goes into the D/C, he waives any protection under the DM statute. I have one case (saying that the DM statute is a sword not a shield). Does anyone have any others
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________